Blogging the Amendment

Offering a Forum to Discuss the Pros and Cons of the Marshall/Newman Amendment

Virginian-Pilot Says NO

In a powerfully worded editorial, The Virginian-Pilot contrasted “(George) Mason’s soaring elegance (in the Virginia Bill of Rights) and the clumsiness of what is commonly referred to as the marriage amendment, penned by Del. Bob Marshall and Sen. Steve Newman.”

Virginians are poorly served by the partisan hack-job written by Marshall and Newman.  “Marriage deserves society’s strongest approval and protection, but that cannot and should not come at the expense of denying fundamental liberties to others. If they truly want to protect marriage, Virginians must do better than this awkward amendment, and these empty assertions about what it would do to protect traditional marriage.”

This Commonwealth, its citizens and its history, deserve better. “If Virginia’s values are contained in Mason’s centuries-old hopes for his commonwealth – and we pray they are – voters will reject the marriage amendment Nov. 7. “

The full text of the editorial is here. 


October 29, 2006 - Posted by | unintended consequences

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: